libGLESv2.dll file report

• » File
• File Details
• Overview
• Analysis

This report summarizes the file identity, detection status, publisher metadata, observed locations, and technical indicators for libGLESv2.dll. ThreatInfo does not have a final classification for this sample yet.

libGLESv2.dll is a Windows file recorded in the ThreatInfo database. It is associated with ANGLE libGLESv2 Dynamic Link Library. The current detection status is Undefined, based on the latest analysis from 2025-09-13 23:01:45 (8 months ago).

ThreatInfo does not have a final classification for this file yet. Use the technical details below to compare the hash, size, signature, and observed locations with the copy found on your device.

File Details

Overview

The signature on libGLESv2.dll is reported as valid. A valid signature helps confirm publisher identity, but it does not automatically make the file safe if the installer was bundled, abused, or downloaded from an untrusted source.

ThreatInfo has observed libGLESv2.dll in the locations listed above. Files found in temporary folders, user profile folders, startup locations, or unusual application directories should be reviewed more carefully than files installed under a known program directory.

The strongest geographic signal for this file is United States with 77.8% of observed hits. Geographic distribution can help identify targeted campaigns, regional software bundles, or where a file is most commonly reported.

The most common operating system signal for libGLESv2.dll is Windows 10 with 100.0% of observed hits. If your system differs from the common profile, check whether the file was introduced by a specific installer, archive, or removable device.

Analysis

libGLESv2.dll is identified as pe for 64 systems. The subsystem is Windows CUI. PE header values are useful for triage, especially when they do not match the expected publisher, product, or release timeline.

PE section names and hashes can reveal packing, injected resources, or unusual build artifacts. Sections with uncommon names, very large raw data, or hashes that differ from a trusted copy deserve additional review.